Legal Opinion
Estenich v. Heenan
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 10, 1995No. Civ. A. No. 94-5688Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER & MEMORANDUM
KATZ, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 10th day of March, 1995, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs, Defendants’ Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion For Attorney’s Fees and Costs, and Plaintiffs Supplemental Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs, and Declaration,1 it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED and plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $9,966.90.2
A plaintiff who prevails on a claim brought pursuant to Section 102 of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (the “LMRDA”), 29…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.