State v. Todd
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
Defendant Paris Jujuan Todd appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for appropriate relief ("MAR"). On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his MAR because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support a conviction and had this been raised during his prior appeal, there is a reasonable probability that defendant's conviction would have been overturned. After reviewing the evidence presented below, we agree, and conclude that the trial court should have granted defendant's MAR. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's denial of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Musacchio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023