Miles v. McCallan
Arizona Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first judicial district, county of Pinal, entered in favor of the-plaintiffs. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
By Court,
Erench, 0. J.:
This is an action under the statute to quiet title to a mining claim.
Both the complaint and answer are verified. The answer expressly admits certain allegations of the complaint, but expressly and specifically denies the more material allegations. It also sets up new matter as a separate defense which if established by proofs would be fatal to plaintiffs’ action.
The practice of expressly admitting in an answer portions of the complaint is not commendable, because it is. entirely unnecessary, and adds to the length of the answer without effecting any useful result. The…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Iba v. Central Ass'n of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
- Finley v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1900
- Johnson v. ManningIdaho Supreme Court · 1892
- Conklin v. ConklinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Alsdorf v. HamptonArizona Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.