Legal Opinion
Koss v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 11, 1964No. Civ. No. C-64-24PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RABINOVITZ, District Judge.
The matter before the Court is a motion for summary judgment by defendant to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint'. It is brought under the provisions of Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the ground that no “genuine issue as to any material fact” exists and that the “moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Defendant claims that a direct action against it is contrary to the provisions of the Wisconsin direct action statute, sec. 260.11(1).
*377This Court has jurisdiction by reason of diversity of citizenship and that the amount in controversy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Billie Charline Guess, Wife of and Administratrix of the Estate of Benjamin Franklin Wiley, Jr. v. Geoffrey Stewart ReadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Ritterbusch v. SexmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Snorek v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Weingartner v. Fidelity Mut. Ins. Co. Of Indianapolis, IndCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Casper v. American International South InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Scribbins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969