Legal Opinion

State of Texas v. Sulflow

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 4, 1910PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Travis County. Tried below before Hon. Chas. A. Wilcox.

1Opinion of the Court

JEHKIHS, Associate Justice.

In 1882 Melvin, Blum & Blum made application under what is known as the Fifty-cent Act (special session 29th Leg., p. 48) to purchase 289 sections of land in Bailey County, Texas, describing each section separately. Section one is described in said application as beginning nine miles west of the southeast corner of Capitol league Ho. 638, thence east, south, west and north 1900 yrs. Each succeeding section calls to begin on the one next preceding it in numerical order, and is described as being 1900 varas square. The sections are numbered from west to east. Taken…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stafford v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Bolton v. LannTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Jones v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Lilly v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Fagan v. StonerTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Findlay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Brady v. McCuistionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Robbs v. WoolfolkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Benavides v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Hamman v. San Jacinto Rice Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API