Legal Opinion

Miller v. Pool and Canfield, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1990No. WD 42379PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NUGENT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Glenn R. and Donna Jo Miller appeal from the order of the trial court granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the basis of collateral estoppel. We reverse and remand with instructions to stay entry of summary judgment.

The plaintiffs argue first that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment because collateral estoppel deprived them of their right to a jury trial, guarantied by the Missouri Constitution, Article I, section 22(a). Second, the Millers contend that collateral estoppel does not apply to their case because: the issues in their…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Carpenter v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. Fahy v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harris v. DeSistoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Hatfield v. CristopherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Ibarra v. Missouri Poster & Sign Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. T.H. v. A.S.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State Ex Rel. Missouri Gas Energy v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API