Kitchin v. Mori

437 P.2d 865 (1968)

Donald M. KITCHIN, Appellant,

v.

Tulio MORI, Respondent.

No. 5373.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

March 4, 1968.

Gordon W. Rice, Reno, for appellant.

Diehl, Recanzone & Evan, Fallon, for respondent.

OPINION

ZENOFF, Justice:

This was a suit by a buyer, Kitchin, for return of moneys paid as deposit and down payment for the purchase of a business. The trial court dismissed the complaint after presentation of the buyer's evidence on the ground that he had failed to prove a sufficient case for the court upon the facts and the law, and also that no basis for restitution had been proved.

In May…