Legal Opinion

Bobbitt v. Maher Beverage Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1949No. 31702 and 31703PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Counsel for the defendants do not seriously urge that the verdict cannot be supported as concerns the questions of negligence and proximate cause. Evidence presented by plaintiff was to the effect that the motor truck of the Maher Beverage Company was traveling north on U. S. route' 23 at a rapid rate of speed, closely followed by the heavily loaded motor truck of Erskine. As these vehicles approached intersecting state route 281, the Maher truck reduced its speed and without warning swerved to the left and then to the right in an attempt to make a right-hand turn onto route 281. The Erskine…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kennard v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Layton v. Ferguson Moving & Storage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. State, Ex Rel. Burton v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Johnson v. Industrial Commission of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. StukeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API