Legal Opinion

In re Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 5, 2019No. MDL No. 1:15-md-2657-FDSPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSaylor, J.

This is a multi-district litigation ("MDL") proceeding arising out of product-liability claims that the use of the drug Zofran (ondansetron ) by pregnant women caused birth defects in their children. Defendant GlaxoSmithKline LLC ("GSK") has moved for summary judgment based on federal preemption-in substance, that state-law claims of failure to provide an adequate warning label are preempted by federal law. For the following reasons, the motion will be denied.

I. Introduction

Zofran is an anti-emetic-that is, a drug that prevents or treats nausea or vomiting. It was initially approved by the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leclair v. GlaxoSmithKline LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API