Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 19, 1993No. C2-92-975PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

Relator Commissioner of Revenue (Commissioner) appeals a decision of the Tax Court holding that respondent insurance companies may claim a Minnesota Comprehensive Health Association assessment as a credit against the companies’ 1986 Minnesota income taxes under Minn.Stat. § 290.-06, subd. 3f(6) (1986) as well as an offset against the premium tax under Minn.Stat. § 62E.11, subd. 8 (1986). If the credit is not authorized against state income taxes, respondents John Hancock Insurance Company (John Hancock) and Mutual Service Insurance Company (Mutual Service) question whether the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. McCannel v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Guilliams v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. State v. McKownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Alabama Mun. Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Meriwether Minnesota Land & Timber, LLC v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Dean v. City of WinonaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Landview Landscaping, Inc. v. Minnehaha Creek Watershed DistrictCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Council of Independent Tobacco Manufacturers of America v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API