Legal Opinion

Cimini v. Belsky

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided January 17, 1986No. Civ. No. 85-111PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAVID V. O’BRIEN, District Judge.

In this case the plaintiff, Michael A. Cimini, (“Cimini”), is struggling to avoid summary dismissal of his complaint. After this case was transferred from Rhode Island, distinctions between Rhode Island and Virgin Islands tort law forced Cimini to attempt to substitute the automobile driver as the defendant in place of the owner. Since the proposed amendment fails to satisfy the three-part test of Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c), we will deny the motion to amend the complaint and will grant the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

I. FACTS

On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Randolph Smith v. Hertz Rent-A-Car and Bernard HeylCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  2. Estephane ex rel. Estephane v. HobsonDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cimini v. BelskyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API