Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Haynes

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 15, 1957No. 12124PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

The question on this appeal is whether the district court erred in dismissing a complaint in which the present appellant asked that the appellees be restrained from using or disposing of property said to belong to two local labor unions. The controversy was presented as one between a citizen of Massachusetts and citizens of Pennsylvania and, therefore, within federal jurisdiction.

Appellant Fitzgerald is president of the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, an unincorporated national labor organization, hereinafter designated UE. His complaint states…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. California v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  5. Green v. BrophyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nathaniel P. Broussard v. Columbia Gulf Transmission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Johnson v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. Johnson v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. Rota v. Brotherhood of RailwayDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  5. Bonar, Inc. v. SchottlandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API