Legal Opinion
Blake v. Dierdorff
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 1988No. 87-5819PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAVY, Circuit Judge:
The appellants, Aaron and Ruth Blake and their retirement and pension trusts (Blake), appeal the district court’s dismissal of their multiple defendant civil RICO action and their claim under section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1938, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a). Subsequent to our decision in In re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation, 823 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir.1987), which holds there is no private right of action under section 17(a), the appellants have withdrawn the appeal of the dismissal of their section 17(a) claim. We affirm the dismissal of defendants…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Semegen v. WeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Sun Savings and Loan Association, a Corporation v. Daniel W. Dierdorff Mary DierdorffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association v. Touche Ross & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- W. Michael Kimes J. Colette Boykin v. Peter G. Stone, Judge, Superior Court Robert L. Mezzetti, II Henry Mariani Robert MacHadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Wells Fargo Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Gupta Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.