Shirley Presley v. City of Charlottesville Rivanna Trails Foundation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTraxler, Circuit Judge
Today’s decision, in my view, departs from a long and well-established body of law under the Fifth Amendment and drastically changes important substantive and procedural aspects of federal inverse condemnation actions. As I explain below, permitting Presley to pursue her claim under the Fourth Amendment results in nothing less than the application of a new standard of liability, the creation of a new spectrum of damages, and the elimination of procedural prerequisites for pursuing an inverse condemnation claim in federal court.
According to Presley’s complaint, the City “seized” a strip of her…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.