Legal Opinion

Hintrager v. Mahoney

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Dubuque District Court. — Hon. C. F. ' Couch, Judge. Action to quiet title of real estate. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtG-rang-eb, J.

1. Tax selIg : rG* demption for toosmalla sum: mistake ■ “afanoV'on^ effectnd: The controversy involves the title to certain lots in the city of Dubuque. The basis of the plaintiff’s title is a tax deed signed by the „ ., 1 —,, , treasurer of said city. When the lots were y -,,, gold for taxes, D. A. Mahoney and others were ^ie owners> as heirs to C. Mahoney, -deceased. Within the statutory period for redemption, D. A. Mahoney paid to the proper officer the amount claimed, and received a certificate of redemption. Some years thereafter the city treasurer issued to plaintiff a deed in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Corning Town Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Weaver v. StacySupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  2. Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. HillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
  3. Bates v. NicholsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Fernandez Co. v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Burchardt v. ScofieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API