Legal Opinion

Rager v. L. & N. R. R.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 19, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

CAS® '98. — AGTfflOIN BY IG. (RAIGEIR, &c. v. (DOUIBVJjLíL®' & INIASIHVEULE IRIAfflURIOIASD COMP1AJNY. Appeal from Muhlenberg Circnit Court, Judgment for defendant and plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

The appellant, Gr. Rager, an infant nine years of age, together with his- statutory guardian, by this action sought to recover of appellee in the court below $5,000.00, damages for an alleged injury to his foot caused, as charged, by the negligence of the latter, its servants and employes, in leaving a truck so near its track at Bevier that a moving train struck and drove it against appellant’s foot as he was passing, thereby inflicting the injury complained of.

■ Appellee’s answer traversed the averments of the petition and alleged contributory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. HumberCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  2. Allard v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  3. Commonwealth v. SkeggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867
  4. Eversole v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rietze v. Williams Ex Rel. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  2. Romans v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Lassiter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Pollack v. Southern Railway in Ky.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Stevens v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API