Ellington v. Bryant
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.
(after stating the facts as above). In Deaton v. Rush, 113 Tex. 176, 252 S. W. 1025, it was held that a suit by the maker of a deed to cancel it was not a suit to recover the land the deed conveyed, and therefore that the statute of limitations applicable to such a suit was the one (article 5690, Vernon’s Statutes) declaring that “every action other than for the recovery of real estate, for which no limitation is otherwise prescribed, shall be brought within four years next after the right to bring the same shall have accrued and not afterward.”
In the same case it was held that, if the cause…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Stewart v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Waltee v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Ward v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Herring & Kelley v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stout v. OliveiraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Kimmell v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Haskins v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Hill v. McIntyre Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Tompkins v. American Republics Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.