State v. Wilson
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HANS J. LILJEBERG, Judge.
|aOn appeal, defendant, Nathan Wilson, argues the sentence imposed against him outside the presence of counsel is illegal and without effect, and requests that this Court remand the matter to the trial court for resentencing with the benefit of counsel. For the reasons set forth more fully below, we vacate defendant’s sentence and remand this matter to the trial court for resentencing.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On September 11, 2002, defendant entered guilty pleas under North Carolina *904v. Alford1 -in two cases pending against him in the 24th Judicial District…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- C. C. Elmer Tank Boiler Co. v. Art Cleaner & DyersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
- McConnell v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. FlaggLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- State v. ChampagneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Smallwood v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Smallwood v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018