Legal Opinion

Mayor &C. of Savannah v. Palefsky

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 25, 1955No. 35417PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

The defendant in the court below contends that no cause of action is stated against it because, by an act of 1895, the General Assembly vested exclusive jurisdiction over trees, parks, grass plats, etc., within the City of Savannah in the Park and Tree Commission, an independent agency. This act does not relieve the city of the duty to keep its sidewalks in a reasonably safe condition. Mayor &c. of Savannah v. Harvey, 87 Ga. App. 122 (73 S. E. 2d 260). In that case it was alleged that the city was negligent in not removing rotten limbs from a tree which was growing in the unpaved area between…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Tallapoosa v. GoebelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  2. City of Atlanta v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Mayor &C. of Savannah v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goldsmith v. HazelwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  2. Rutherford v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. McCrary Engineering Corp. v. City of BowdonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API