Legal Opinion

Fontanez v. Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Companies

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)

Decided September 10, 1992No. 12-90-00341-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOTION FOR REHEARING

SMITH, Justice,

(retired).

Appellant’s motion for a rehearing is granted. Our opinion and judgment issued on July 27, 1992 are withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted in lieu thereof.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the Texas standard automobile insurance policy provision which excludes an insured’s vehicle from the definition of “uninsured motor vehicle” is a valid and enforceable provision when applied to the facts of this case. Specifically, can an insured recover uninsured benefits when injured by an uninsured thief who is operating the insured’s own…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Puckett v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Stracener v. United Services Automobile Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Briones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
  4. Scarborough v. Employers Casualty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Gibbs v. National General Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Pease v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. Hertz Corp. v. PapDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1995
  5. Garza v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API