Smith v. Pettus, Curator

I think the rule applied in Parker v. Dendy, 203 Ark. 188, 157 S. W. 2d 48, should be applied here. There it was held that the right of an infant to redeem from a mortgage foreclosure sale does not inure to the benefit of adult co-tenants wlio were properly before the court, and whose rights were barred by the foreclosure sale, and that if the mortgagee offers to permit an infant to redeem his interest by paying his pro rata part of the obligation, the court should not set aside the decrees for sale and confirmation. Here the only complaint of the tax title holders is that the redemption…