Legal Opinion

Patty & Brockington v. Hillsboro Roller Mill Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 23, 1893No. 27PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the County Court of Hill.

1Opinion of the Court

LIGHTFOOT, Chief Justice.

In October, 1889, appellants, with a number of others, signed the following subscription paper:

66 Hillsboro, Texas, October 23, 1889.

‘1 The State of Texas, County of Hill.—Articles of Agreement.—We, the undersigned subscribers, agree to form an incorporated company for the purpose of building and operating a roller flour mill of 100 barrels of flour and 25 barrels of meal per day of twenty-four hours, in the city of Hillsboro, Hill County, State of Texas, and we each contract and agree to subscribe and pay for in cash the amounts set opposite our respective names, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cottage Street Methodist Episcopal Church v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Peet v. Commerce & Ervay Street Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hopkins v. UpshurTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Williams v. RoganTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Nolan County v. W. B. Simpson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API