Legal Opinion

Nolan County v. W. B. Simpson & Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1889No. 6203PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Nolan. Tried below before Hon. Wm. Kennedy. The opinion states the ease.

1Opinion of the Court

Henry, Associate Justice.

The county of Holán instituted this suit against W, B. Simpson & Co., a firm composed of W. B. Simpson, J. B. Coleman, and B. L. Dunman, to recover twenty-nine hundred less eighty-seven dollars.

The firm of W. B. Simpson & Co. were engaged in doing a general mercantile and a limited exchange business in Holán County.

The county of Holán was engaged in constructing a court house, and for that purpose had issued its bonds in sums of one thousand dollars each, which it desired to negotiate for money.

The business of W. B. Simpson & Co. was conducted exclusively by W. B.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. San Patricio County v. McClaneTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Colorado County v. BeetheTexas Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Travis County v. Pelzel & Associates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bland v. OrrTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
  4. Travis County v. Pelzel & Associates, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  5. White v. CalawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API