Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Draughon

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 28, 2012No. SC09-2056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Respondent Richard Scott Draughon be found guilty of professional misconduct and receive a public reprimand. The Florida Bar has filed a petition for review of the report, challenging the referee’s recommended sanction. Draughon has filed a cross-petition for review. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. As discussed below, we approve the referee’s findings of fact, as well as the referee’s recommendation that Draughon be found guilty of violating Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 3-4.3 (Misconduct and Minor Misconduct).…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. FrederickSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. The Florida Bar v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Jon Douglas ParrishSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  2. Florida Bar v. SwannSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. The Florida Bar v. Curtis S. AlvaSupreme Court of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API