Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Wisconsin Real Estate Brokers' Board

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1958PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

Counsel for the five respondents contend that the order of the board revoking or suspending the respondents’ licenses is void by reason of failure of the board to comply with statutory procedural requirements in instituting the proceedings against the respondents.

The first defect raised is that no formal complaint was entered or served upon the respondents as provided by sec. 136.08 (4), Stats., and sec. 3.01 (2) of the rules of the board as set forth in vol. 5 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code. This argument seems to overlook the provisions of sub. (2) of sec. 136.08, which provides two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Berenson v. NirensteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Smith v. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. MacKey v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Werner v. LeserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Jones v. New Mexico State Racing CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Hercules v. Robedeaux, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  4. Sailer v. Wisconsin Real Estate Brokers' BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Gregory v. SelleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API