Tomlinson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
The appellants were convicted in the District Court under an indictment charging them and Charles Henry Bass with the crime of robbery. They challenged the sufficiency of the indictment on the grounds that there was a misjoinder of offenses and that it charged no offense against appellants.
The offense of robbery is defined by the statute of the District of Columbia, as follows: '.'Whoever by force or violence, whether against resistance or by sudden or stealthy seizure or snatching, or by putting in fear, shall take from the person or immediate actual possession of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Raffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Fitzpatrick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Reagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Charles Daniel Everett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. E. Bruce HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.