Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Green

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 20, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellee recovered judgment against the appellant railroad company for $2.5 damages for killing a •dog owned by him, and the railroad company has appealed.

For the reversal of the judgment it is insisted that there was no testimony showing that the dog was killed by the railroad company, and that the court erred in giving certain instructions and in refusing others, and in the admission of certain testimony.

On behalf of appellee a section-hand employed by the railroad testified .that he lived near the railroad track, and that, during the night, he heard a dog howling on •the track. The next…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. El Dorado & Bastrop Railway Co. v. KnoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  2. Holloman v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. CrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Sewer & Waterworks Improvement District No. 1 v. McClendonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. Duff v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Missouri Pacific R.R. Co., Thompson v. BrinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API