Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Crick

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 6, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Two errors are assigned for reversal of the judgment, first, for want of proper parties, it being insisted that the mother of the deceased, appellee, was not properly appointed administratrix and not entitled to bring suit; and that the testimony was insufficient to support the verdict.

The statute provides to whom letters of administration may be granted for the survival of causes of action for damages caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of another, and that such actions shall be brought in the name of the personal representative of such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. HempflingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. v. GodfreySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Kelly v. DeQueen & Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Central Railway Co. v. LindleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reed v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Dawson v. GerritsenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. PaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson, Tr. v. PennySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. GradySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API