Legal Opinion

United States v. Hall

District Court, D. Montana

Decided January 27, 1918No. 597PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Ves Hall was indicted for violation of Espionage Act, § 3. On motion for directed verdict of acquittal.

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

On yesterday, granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, the court stated that, because of the grave issues involved and the necessity for interpretation of the Espionage Act, to the end that a precedent be established, it would incorporate its reasons and views in a written decision and opinion, made a part of the records of the case and of the court. It accordingly does so as follows;

The indictment charges that defendant violated section 3 of the Espionage Act, in that (l) he did “make and convey false reports and false statements with intent to interfere…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rhuberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
  2. State v. TownleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. United States v. NaglerDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API