Legal Opinion

United States v. Nagler

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 25, 1918Published

Louis B. Nagler was indicted for violation of Espionage Act, §' 3. On motion to quash the indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

EVAN A. EVANS, Acting District Judge.

Defendant moves to quash the indictment returned against him, because it fails to state facts sufficient to.charge him with the commission of a crime. Section 3 of the Espionage Act, in force at the time the offense is alleged to have been committed, approved June 15, 1917 (40 Stat. 219, c. 30), reads as follows (the paragraphing, as well as the figures in parentheses are mine):

“Whoever, when the United States is at war,
“(1) Shall willfully make or convey false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. HallDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1918
  2. United States v. SchutteDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API