Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. B.M.D. Golf Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 27, 2002No. 2001-419PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The plaintiffs, Jeffrey and Susan MacDonald, appeal from a jury verdict denying recovery for Jeffrey’s injuries sustained at a golf course owned by the defendant, B.M.D. Golf Associates, Inc. On appeal, the plaintiffs argue that the Trial Court (O’Neill, J.) erred by: (1) denying them the opportunity to impeach witnesses using subsequent remedial *584measure evidence; and (2) improperly admitting hearsay evidence. We reverse and remand.

The relevant facts follow. Jeffrey was injured while riding in a golf cart at the defendant’s Indian Mound Golf Club. His golf party consisted of his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Cyr v. J.I. Case Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Simpson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. State v. SoldiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Madeja v. MPB Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. Brodeur v. Claremont School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
  3. State v. PepinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  4. Murray v. Developmental Services of Sullivan County, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. State v. Samuel PennockSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API