Legal Opinion
State Public School Building Authority v. Tectum Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 9, 1963No. Civ. A. Nos. 7487, 7815PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the following motions:
1. Of defendant, Tectum, to dismiss or quash the return of service on the grounds that Tectum is an Ohio corporation, is not subject to service of process in Pennsylvania, is not licensed to do business in Pennsylvania, is not doing business in Pennsylvania, and was not properly served.
2. Of third-party defendant, Hunter, (a) to dismiss or quash the return of service as to Tectum on the following grounds: (1) no venue; (2) Tectum is an Ohio corporation and was not and is not subject to service of process in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rufo v. the Bastian-Blessing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Merner v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Gartner v. Lombard Bros., Inc. (E. I. Dupont De Nemours Co., Third Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Kulicke v. Rollway Bearing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Baxter v. CoppockDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. BourneWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
- State Highway Commission v. BourneWyoming Supreme Court · 1967