Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Koch

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1874PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Jtppeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. I. “Motions to strike out parts of pleadings should contain the parts sought to be stricken out; or those parts should be so designated that they can be readily ascertained.” (Pierce vs. McIntyre, 29 Mo., 423.) II. Again: “All motions shall be accompanied by a written specification of the reasons upon which they are founded; and no reasons not so specified shall be urged in support of the motions.” (Geni.

Read the full summary

Jtppeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. I. “Motions to strike out parts of pleadings should contain the parts sought to be stricken out; or those parts should be so designated that they can be readily ascertained.” (Pierce vs. McIntyre, 29 Mo., 423.) II. Again: “All motions shall be accompanied by a written specification of the reasons upon which they are founded; and no reasons not so specified shall be urged in support of the motions.” (Geni. Stat. 1865, ch. 165, § 48, p. 662.) In the case before the court, no specifications whatever were given in the motion. A mere general indefinite…

1Opinion of the CourtVories, Judge

This action was brought in the St. Louis Circuit Court to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff from the wrongful act of the defendant, in violently running his buggy against the wagon in which plaintiff” was riding along the public streets of St. Louis. •

For a proper understanding of the, case, the petition, al though a long one,will be set out in full. It is as follows: “Timothy O’Connor, the plaintiff in this suit, complains of Theodore Koch the defendant in this suit, and sets forth his complaint in this, his petition, as follows: That is to say, he, the said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowie v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Parker v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. Bruce v. VogelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Williams v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Butler v. LawsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Shohoney v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. Fenton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Bevin v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API