Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Earl

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1968No. File 10372PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENTTO, Judge.

This action was brought to recover a real estate broker's commission. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. On defendant's motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, the verdict was set aside and a judgment entered in fayor of 'the defendant in accordance with his motion for a directed verdict. From this the plaintiff appeals.

Defendant was the owner of a well, improved farm in Davison County, South Dakota, containing about a section of land. When he evidenced a desire to sell it for $96,000 a mutual friend who had resided in Iowa, suggested that he list the farm…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Knight v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Owens v. CapriWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hullander v. McIntyreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. William Coltin & Co. v. Manchester Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
  5. Horwitz v. FOOD TOWN, INCORPORATEDDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of DokkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Estate of PodgurskySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Widdoss v. DonahueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Dunhill of Fargo, Inc. v. Lahman Manufacturing, Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. United States v. SorensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API