Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. Gibbons and Reed

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1972No. 12550PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff initiated this action, as administrator of his wife’s estate for her wrongful death, and on behalf of himself for personal injuries and property damage sustained in a motor vehicle collision. Defendant moved for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence offered by plaintiff, Rule 50(a), U.R.C.P.; the trial court granted the motion, rendered judgment for the defendant, and discharged the jury. The trial court subsequently denied plaintiff’s motion to amend the judgment or for a new trial; plaintiff appeals.

On September 11, 1965, at approximately eight…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ToopsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Alvarado v. TuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hansen v. ClydeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Milligan v. Capitol Furniture CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Newman v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. GeoMetWatch v. BehuninCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  2. Goebel v. Salt Lake City Southern RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Highland Construction Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. IGA Food Fair v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Smith v. Volkswagen SouthtowneUtah Supreme Court · 2022

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API