Legal Opinion

Page v. Muzyn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 20, 1993No. 9102-01303; CA A74658PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

This matter is before the court on plaintiffs petition for attorney fees on appeal. Plaintiff used a percentage formula to determine the requested fee. Defendants’ sole objection is that ORAP 13.10(3) requires use of an hourly rate times hours formula and does not authorize use of a percentage formula. We disagree, and allow the petition.

Plaintiff sued defendants, who are a local government and a police officer, for a deprivation of civil rights under 42 USC § 1983, 1 and obtained ajudgment for damages and attorney fees. Defendants appealed, and we affirmed without opinion. Page v. Muzyn, 119…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hess v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Griffin v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of CraigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coulter Property Management, Inc. v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Erickson v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API