Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. MacDiarmid v. Eastman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1928No. 20725PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The proceeding which it is sought to have prohibited in this action was one instituted by the board of park commissioners of the Cleveland metropolitan park district for the assessment of compensation for certain land in which the relators have an interest, the appropriation of which was contemplated for park purposes. The action had been fully tried and submitted to a jury, the jury had returned its verdict, and a motion for a new trial was pending whbn this suit was instituted.

The primary question presented by the demurrer to the petition is whether the facts alleged are such as to entitle…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carmody v. JusticeOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Sargent v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Coyne v. TodiaOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State Ex Rel. Methodist Book Concern v. GuckenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Shepard Paint Co. v. Board of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Emanuel v. Township of TwinsburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. State Ex Rel. George D. Harter Bank v. LindsayOhio Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API