Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided September 19, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Bobby Tullis State Representative Box 277 Mineral Springs, Arkansas 71851

Dear Representative Tullis:

This is in response to your request for an opinion on several questions involving the trespassing of animals on posted lands. Your questions are restated below and answered in the order posed.

Your first question is as follows:

Does a hunting dog owned by one person entering on the posted property of another person without permission for "recreational purposes" constitute an unlawful act under Arkansas law?

In response to this question, I have attached a copy of Opinion No. 89-045…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cagle v. MonroeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  2. Kearbey v. DouglasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Reinman v. WorleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API