Campbell v. Jordan
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEATHERS, J.:
Donald Campbell (“Donald”) instituted this partition action against his two siblings, Mary Alice Richardson and Harvey Campbell, and his two nieces, Wendy Jordan and Elizabeth Langley (“the nieces”). After ruling that an in kind partition was appropriate, the special referee ordered that the real property be surveyed and subdivided. On appeal, the nieces claim the special referee erred in refusing to consider their emotional attachment to the property awarded to Donald, in refusing to strike certain testimony from the record, and in ordering the nieces’ mother, Betty Jean (“Betty…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. SchumpertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Creech v. South Carolina Wildlife & Marine Resources DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Glasscock, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Gamble v. International Paper Realty Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oaks At Rivers Edge Prop. Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Daniel Island Riverside Developers, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- Belle Hall Plantation Homeowner's Ass'n v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
- Dawkins v. SellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
- Turner v. MUSCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020