Legal Opinion · Dissent

Durham v. Durham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 18, 2012No. S12A0537; S12A0607Published

1DissentHunstein, Presiding Justice

While, as a matter of policy, I agree with the majority that “equity cases” should go to the Court of Appeals, I disagree that our precedent mandates that result in this case. This Court has two competing lines *236of authority concerning the proper appellate court to hear appeals concerning express trusts. The majority follows our decisions holding that we look at the issue on appeal and transfer the case to the Court of Appeals if the equitable relief sought is ancillary to the legal relief. As a practical matter, this analysis means that the default is for every “equity case” to be heard in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Redfearn v. Huntcliff Homes Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Lewis v. Van AndaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  4. Kemp v. NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Snook v. SessomsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API