State v. DeLeon
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶ 1 The Fifth Amendment provides that a defendant shall not “be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” U.S. Const, amend. V. Accordingly, voluntary statements made by a criminal defendant can be admitted at trial but compelled statements cannot. In this case, defendants were forced to choose between making incriminating statements and facing physical violence. Those incriminating statements were then used *481against the defendants at trial. Under these circumstances, we do not see how the statements could possibly be considered voluntary and admissible. One should not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Guillermina Cortes-Quinones v. Charles Jimenez-Nettleship, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- State v. MondayWashington Supreme Court · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. A.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
- State of Washington v. Jose Jesus MancillaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Commonwealth v. Hamlett, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Courtney Allen, Et Ano. v. Todd Zonis, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Brian K. TerwillegerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.