Legal Opinion

Heitz v. Kunkel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1994No. 18825PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

Charles J. Kunkel (Appellant) appeals from the judgment in this court-tried ease regarding a sewer line across his property. As part of its judgment, the trial court (1) decreed that Sheila T. Heitz, Gary R. Heitz, Valerie Heitz, and Michelle K. Heitz (the Heitzes) have a sewer line easement across Appellant’s property, (2) enjoined Appellant from interfering with the Heitzes’ use of the sewer line, and (3) entered a judgment for $7,202 against Appellant for damages caused when he cut and blocked off the Heitzes’ sewer line. We reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neal v. DrennanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Polette v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Vanderson v. VandersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Spellerberg v. HuhnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Bunker R-III School District v. HodgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Empire District Electric Co. v. CoverdellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Debra S. Pauli and Steven G. Spicer v. Gwen SpicerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Jones v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Feinberg v. FeinbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Mo. State Conference of the Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API