Legal Opinion

Feinberg v. Feinberg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1996No. 67758PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AHRENS, Judge.

Defendants Dan and John Feinberg appeal four charging orders entered against them, two charging orders against Dan and two against John, and in favor of plaintiffs Virginia Feinberg and the Adolph K. Feinberg Hotel Trust (“Hotel Trust”). Defendants raise three points on appeal. The first point contends the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction by appointing a receiver over the partnership interests of Dan and John even though this remedy was not pleaded or prayed for. The second point asserts the trial judge erroneously took judicial notice of his recollections from a prior…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Rouse Co. of Missouri v. Justin's, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Feinberg v. Adolph K. Feinberg Hotel TrustMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Poole v. PooleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Cox v. BryantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Missouri National Education Ass'n v. Missouri State Board of EducationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. City of Greenwood v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Rosenfeld v. ThoeleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. In the Interest of A.A.T.N.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Capital Bank v. BarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API