Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Angerhofer

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 8, 1992No. 92-4072Published

1Opinion of the Court

982 F.2d 530

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Richard Dee THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

David J. ANGERHOFER; Andrew Hunt; Vickie Bridwall; Paul

Larsen; Pete Haun; Michael R. Sibbett; Victoria J.

Palacios; Donald Blanchard; Paul…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Pulliam v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API