Commonwealth v. Graham
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGants, C.J.
**517 Rule 36 of the Massachusetts Rules of Criminal Procedure, as amended, 422 Mass. 1503 (1996) ( rule 36 ), provides that, if a criminal defendant is not tried "within twelve months" after arraignment, "he shall be entitled upon motion to a dismissal of the charges." Mass. R. Crim. P. 36 (b) (1) (C). A defendant may establish *587 a prima facie violation of rule 36 by demonstrating that more than twelve months have elapsed between arraignment and trial. See Commonwealth v. Denehy , 466 Mass. 723 , 729, 2 N.E.3d 161 (2014). The burden then shifts to the Commonwealth to justify the delay, either…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- L.L., a juvenile v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. Jones-PannellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Barry v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. FarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vasquez v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- COMMONWEALTH v. GARRETT VIL.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- Commonwealth v. Caraballo-NievesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026
- Commonwealth v. Geraldo RojasMassachusetts Superior Court · 2020
- Commonwealth v. John LaraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.