Legal Opinion

Debeatham v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 28, 2010No. 09-0205-agPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner Andrew Debeatham (“petitioner” or “Debeatham”), a native and citizen of Jamaica, seeks review of a December 15, 2008 decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. Petitioner argues, as he did before the BIA, that he is entitled to reopening based on the ineffective assistance of his prior counsel. We hold that petitioner failed to comply with the requirements of In re Lozada, 19 I. & N. Dec. 637, 639 (B.I.A.1988), in asserting one of counsel’s alleged errors and failed to show prejudice arising from the remaining alleged…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Alexander Twum v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Guillermo Hernandez Ruiz v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. Vartelas v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. GerasimowiczDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  4. Ud Din v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  5. Olunike Adeaga v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API