Legal Opinion

Walker v. Hollinger

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1998No. 23345PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This appeal involves a claim for a prescriptive easement. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of certain lot owners in the Wilderness Ranch Subdivision after determining that a prescriptive easement existed in their favor over the property of Jay Hollinger and Carol Bradshaw (the Hollingers). The Hollingers appeal, arguing that the district court applied the wrong legal theory in concluding that a prescriptive easement exists. Some of the lot owners cross appeal, claiming the district court erred by dismissing their claim for reservation of an easement by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Smith v. Meridian Joint School District No. 2Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  3. West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. City of Chubbuck v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shawver v. Huckleberry Estates, L.L.C.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Potlatch Education Ass'n v. Potlatch School District No. 285Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Intermountain Forest Management, Inc. v. LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hodgins v. SalesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Davis v. PeacockIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API