Legal Opinion

Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Department of Employment & Training

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 7, 1994No. 92-P-1846PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

In December, 1986, the plaintiff Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. (C & S), a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, had 800 employees and $60 million in revenues; Magnetic Corporation of America (MCA), another subsidiary, had but one employee and was no longer in business. On December 29, 1986, the two corporations were combined. C & S continued to do business under its own name, the MCA employee being added to its payroll. On grounds that need not be recounted here, the Department of Employment and Training (DET) decided that MCA rather than C & S was *331the “successor” employer for purposes of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Perkins School for the Blind v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Broadhurst v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Sargeant v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Ware v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hollstein v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API