Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. Kaplan

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.

Plaintiff insurance company instituted this action to recover judgment declaring rescinded and null and void the disability and double indemnity provisions contained in three policies, and the double indemnity provision in a fourth policy, issued by it to the defendant Emanuel Kaplan, because of alleged false representations made by defendant in response to questions submitted to him when applying for such policies. The proof adduced on the trial, both oral and documentary, incontrovertibly indicates the falsity of the representations and the materiality thereof; and on those questions the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eastern District Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Rhine v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Rubin v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. Windsor Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Boro Precision Products Corp. v. John Hancock Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API