Legal Opinion

Boro Precision Products Corp. v. John Hancock Mutual Fire Insurance

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 14, 1963No. 61-C-223PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTELS, District Judge.

This is an action to recover $30,000 death benefits under a 10-year level term life insurance policy provision issued by the defendant (Insurance Company) supplementary to a pre-existing $20,000 preferred risk whole life insurance policy on the life of one Melvyn Ladenheim (Ladenheim). Selma Ladenheim (Selma), the wife of the insured, was the beneficiary under the $20,000 whole life insurance provision and the plaintiff (Boro) was the beneficiary under the $30,000 10-year term insurance provision. Upon the death of the insured the Insurance Company paid Selma but…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. S. & E. Motor Hire Corp. v. New York Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Armstrong v. Agricultural InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company v. J. D. JanesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  5. Zeldman v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graybar Elec. Co., Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2008
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. DukoffDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API